By Gianna Barberia,
Bulletin Correspondent
“We’ll be sharing our war stories,” Earl Brechlin, editor of the Mount Desert Islander of Bar Harbor, Maine, said to a laughing audience.
Brechlin was not describing the war on terror or even President Donald Trump’s newly declared “running war with the media.”
Brechlin was describing the ongoing and often tedious struggles between community newspapers and their communities.
Brechlin spoke on a panel with Paul Miller, executive editor of the Keene (N.H.) Sentinel, and Rod Doherty, former executive editor of Foster’s Daily Democrat of Dover, N.H., at the New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention.
The panel discussion, which took place at the Boston Marriott Long Wharf hotel Saturday, Feb. 25, was titled “Heart and backbone of community journalism.” About 70 people attended.
The discussion focused on major difficulties community newspapers consistently face, with the biggest involving keeping and maintaining relationships and attempts to bribe journalists.
Doherty, now retired, described a story from his early newspaper days when he interviewed a chef at a vocational school. Doherty said the chef later opened a restaurant near the newspaper where Doherty was a reporter and which he and his colleagues frequented. Doherty became friends with the chef; the chef occasionally bought him beers and provided him with Patriots tickets, Doherty said. The chef eventually made a special request of Doherty, he said.
“He said, ‘I’m running for city council, and I need you to write good stories for me to help me get elected,’” Doherty recalled.
Doherty said that, at the time, he was confused and told the chef that he could not do that, and the chef replied: “What did you think all those beers and tickets were for?”
“It was enlightening,” Doherty said. “I was being bribed, and I didn’t even know it!”
Brechlin described his own attempted bribery story, in which he was offered tickets to travel to Key West in exchange for a good review.
“Certainly, you can’t take that,” Brechlin said.
Although the audience chuckled at the anecdotes, the three panelists reminded the audience that you can never accept gifts or services from any news sources, because it is a conflict of interest.
“You can’t afford to make a mistake,” Doherty said.
Bribes are not the only dilemma community journalists face, however.
Many journalists struggle with maintaining friendships and relationships while doing their job.
After the local fire chief proposed hiring two additional firefighters, the Keene Sentinel looked into firefighter salaries, finding that many firefighters made large chunks of money in overtime pay, Miller said. As a result, the Keene Sentinel decided to publish the salaries of all of the firefighters in the county, a decision Miller said he found personally hard because of his relationships within the department.
“I had two really close friends in the fire department staff,” Miller said. “When that story came out and was published, let’s just say we didn’t have any friends in the fire department.”
Doherty said he had few friends when he was a reporter, and that he found it hard not to strain relationships through his work, even with those closest to him.
“My son was in the police log; I didn’t cut it. My wife was in an accident; we ran the story,” Doherty said. “Was it pleasant? No.”
Doherty said those doing newspaper work are journalists first, and that you need to relay that to those with whom you are friendly.
Miller said: “You just have to know that there’s the potential down the road to hold (your friends) accountable for something.”
Brechlin said: “News and readers come first. Then, you can worry about patching up relationships.”
Although the atmosphere at the panel discussion was mostly lighthearted, many audience members voiced serious concerns.
One woman said that because she reports in the town where she grew up, she finds it hard to be taken seriously as a reporter by officials who have known her and her family for years.
“Publish their salaries and then they’ll take you seriously,” Brechlin joked.
The panelists said journalists need to command authority and respect.
“They need to know you’re a person who would hold people accountable,” Miller said. “Your primary job is serving the people.”
Miller concluded the workshop by giving the audience some advice and assurance: “Don’t underestimate the power of the newspaper, no matter your circulation.”
MANAGEMENT

‘You just have to know that there’s the potential down the road to hold (your friends) accountable for something.’
—Paul Miller, Executive editor
Keene (N.H.) Sentinel

‘News and readers come first. Then, you can worry about patching up relationships.’
—Earl Brechlin, Editor
Mount Desert Islander, Bar Harbor, Maine

‘It was enlightening. I was being bribed, and I didn’t even know it!’
—Rod Doherty, Former executive editor
Foster’s Daily Democrat, Dover, N.H.
‘Dont’ underestimate the power of the newspaper, no matter your circulation.’
—Paul Miller













































At long last, the stuff of journalism
Gene Policinski, inside the First Amendment
Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. He can be reached at gpolicinski@newseum.org.
Follow him on Twitter:
@genefac
The resignation of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. White House internal disputes that stall policy decisions. Even a mini-crisis involving North Korea.
At long last: the stuff of journalism.
After seeming eons of the squishiness of reporting on campaign claims and counterclaims, email investigations that went nowhere, and distractions including faux-home TV shopping pitches, late-night tweets and daytime insults, a free press is now in full operating mode in the role that the nation’s founders intended: as a watchdog on government.
The fact is that in an era when even the existence of “facts” is seriously debated, the nation’s news media is doing its job by keeping its fellow citizens informed and holding government official accountable — most recently around Flynn’s departure, with questions that echo the fabled inquiry of Watergate: “What did the President know, and when did he know it?”
About a week ago, The Washington Post reported that Flynn might have discussed the Obama administration’s sanctions against Russia with the Russian ambassador, an action that would have been inappropriate and possibly even illegal at the time it took place. The White House knew for weeks of Flynn’s compromising behavior — but with the Post report, we knew it.
The latest news is the White House’s fierce condemnation of the leaks that brought about Flynn’s resignation. The press has pushed back, calling it a move to focus blame on those who revealed Flynn’s conduct rather than the conduct itself. That anti-media message was nonetheless fully reported by the same “fake media” that Trump targeted.
And then there was North Korea’s surprise launch of an intermediate-range ICBM missile during a U.S. visit by Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Along with that news, reporters and photographers conveyed to Americans how their new president handled the moment — from “live” images of the terse statement of support for Japan, to the casual approach to discussing national security at a resort restaurant table, in full view of other diners.
Notice please, no mention here of “Saturday Night Live” sketches, late-night comedy monologues, social media rants gone viral or “alt-right” opinion operations. Let’s defend those as a vigorous, vital part of free speech, or even — in a stretch — as covered by the free press protections for opinion on matters of public interest. But none are Journalism with a big “J.”
No doubt this favorable view of how journalists operate on our behalf won’t be shared by the sizeable numbers of those who simply dislike or distrust the press. And Trump and Co. continue to send mixed signals about Flynn’s resignation and reporting around it: From counselor Kellyanne Conway’s “100 percent” support of Flynn, to Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s statement about an hour later that Trump demanded Flynn’s resignation because of an “eroding level of trust,” to Trump’s complaint that “fake media” conspired with rogue members of the intelligence community to get Flynn fired, followed by a rambling broadside against the media at an extended press conference.
But the fact (that word again) is that our nation’s first leaders faced a press more antagonistic than today’s mainstream media — a press that regularly dealt in “fake news” and gleefully manufactured scandals — and still went the extra mile to create unprecedented protections for what we say and write, and what we report and offer our opinions about.
By the way, that “we” is you, me and the blogger next door, as well as the national news outlets, and the local newspapers and radio stations. Once we get information — from the president or from leaks — we’re free to tell others about it. Self-governing societies require that free flow of information, versus government handouts or news blackouts.
Martin Baron, the Washington Post’s executive editor, was called on Feb. 15 at the Code Media conference in California to both explain and defend the Post’s approach to reporting on the Trump administration.
Baron’s response: “We’re not at war with the administration, we’re at work. We’re doing our jobs.”
Baron also said the news media, overall, “are too competitive with each other to behave in any way like a party … we’re not the opposition either. We’re independent.”
In addition to paying attention to what the press is reporting, we ought to be celebrating that independence — from the Post to Fox News to MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” to CNN to The Wall Street Journal to “Fox & Friends” to Breitbart News. The “marketplace of ideas” is alive in the Digital Age.
Lest this be considered unrestrained adoration of all journalism, let’s agree that there is plenty to be critical of in this wild, disruptive era of new tech, social media and upside-down finances behind most media operations. To name a few examples: the often seamy “reports” by online outlets like the former Gawker site, the decision by BuzzFeed to report unsupported allegations about President Trump, and the well-aired rumors about First Lady Melania Trump.
And there are the ongoing questions since the dawn of the Republic over media ethics, good taste, accuracy, fairness, and — to borrow a useful phrase coined by comedian Stephen Colbert — “truthiness.”
But let’s hear it today for the free press. Here’s a final fact: Right now, the news media is showing the nation what the “news” part of that name means.