By Alex Eng,
Bulletin Correspondent
Mobile publishing tailors its content to the public’s specific information needs and might be the next big trend in local news reporting, according to Lee Little, one of the speakers at the upcoming New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention.
“No other organization in a community can do what a newspaper can do, and those same principles that work in print will also work in mobile to make a successful mobile solution,” Little said in a telephone interview.
Little’s speech on “The mobile landscape for publishers” will be one of dozens of sessions at the convention. The convention is scheduled for Friday, Feb. 24, and Saturday, Feb. 25, in the Boston Marriott Long Wharf hotel.
Mobile apps and websites channeling online content have challenged local newspaper circulation in recent decades. Little said, however, that print and mobile publishing, while fundamentally different in content type and delivery, can work together to serve a local community.
“Print and mobile can coexist, and they complement each other … Print is more about discovery. Mobile is about getting the information you want at your fingertips,” he said.
Little said newspapers would continue to specialize in printing longer forms of storytelling and reporting. They would also remain a place of engagement where readers could encounter stories they would have never read before, something that newspapers are better at doing than mobile publishers.
“Mobile’s not necessarily a good fit for long-form editorial content. You don’t want to read a long article on a 4-inch screen,” he said.
Still, although a relatively new business, mobile publishing has big potential to help local newspapers jump into digital media, Little said.
“The biggest challenge in the newspaper industry is (facilitating) an understanding of the real opportunity in digital that newspapers should be embracing. We believe that the local newspapers are best positioned to own the digital market.
“To be successful in mobile, you need to have content, you need to have the ability to monetize it, and you need to market it,” he said.
Little foresees that mobile websites teamed with local news organizations could display local high school football game scores as well as events, coupons, and deals in any given community. One concept, which he calls the City Portal, would link a community’s local newspaper with its tourism group to offer information for both visitors and residents in an official town app or mobile website.
Local businesses could advertise on mobile apps or websites, and newspapers could profit off banner and interstitial ads.
Little’s speech will raise questions about how mobile publishing attracts readers and generates revenue for local news outlets.
“I’m going to be talking about the mobile marketplace,” he said. “How are people using mobile today? Where are the eyeballs? How much time do they spend on the apps? What’s the difference between a responsive design website and an app? Why is mobile important to the local publisher?”
Little’s speech will also try to convince newspapers of the importance of mobile publishing. Big technology companies such as Apple and Google are not going to cede their mobile publishing businesses, and mobile publishing is not going to go away, he said.
“They’re not going to take their foot off the pedal on mobile, and the local newspapers should embrace it and own it,” he said.
Little is the founder and chief executive officer of Bar-Z, an 11-year-old mobile development company based in Austin, Texas, that offers clients a range of newspaper-centric mobile solutions. Bar-Z develops iPhone and Android apps and responsive-design mobile websites for a variety of publishers, 70 percent of which are newspapers.
Under Little’s management, Bar-Z uses a centralized back-end content management system to work with clients to develop, publish, and promote content with app marketing, sales, and monetization training. Clients have used its platform to publish content relating to travel and visitor guides, dining services, and real estate.
Before founding Bar-Z, Little was a salesman and marketing consultant for 20 years for technology companies such as Dell and Epson. He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Delaware and later received a master of business administration degree from Pepperdine University.
NENPA Convention Speaker

‘No other organization in a community can do what newspaper can do, and those same principles that work in print will also work in mobile to make a successful mobile solution.’
—Lee Little, Founder, CEO
Bar-Z, Austin, Texas
‘We believe that the local newspapers are best positioned to own the digital market.’
—Lee Little
‘To be successful in mobile, you need to have content, you need to have the ability to monetize it, and you need to market it.’
—Lee Little
















Inaugural Day ‘open letter’ – to the rest of us
Gene Policinski, inside the First Amendment
Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. He can be reached at gpolicinski@newseum.org.
Follow him on Twitter:
@genefac
Sending an “open letter” to President Trump has been in vogue these days.
Social activists, business moguls, media chieftains and political leaders all have penned a multitude of them since the November election. Some offer advice, some raise alarms, some offer praise and some just convey insults.
All well and good – those exchanges and more are in the “free speech and free press” ethos protected by the First Amendment of speaking “truth to power” – even if the response from Trump more often than not has been to tar vigorously any unfavorable messages as “untruth.”
So this moment in history is just too ripe not to join in, but with a twist: Here’s my open letter about our core freedoms of speech, press, assembly, petition and religion … as a note not to the new commander in chief, but to the rest of us — “We, The People.”
For those who reveled in Trump’s oath of office, take a moment to consider that the freedoms of speech and press that he seems to be targeting were in no small way vital to a campaign rooted in reaching out to those who felt marginalized, ignored or even betrayed by both major parties.
Trump’s ongoing “fireside tweets” are both new to American politics and an echo of FDR’s similar mastery of the new medium of his era, radio, to speak directly to voters. He and we need to keep in mind that loosening libel laws to make it easier to sue a reporter also will make it easier to mount a legal challenge to all of us – including Trump – over our online comments.
And then there’s Trump’s biting, emotional indictments of the news media. More than 60 news and free press organizations earlier this week sent a multi-page note to the president and Vice President Pence, asking for a meeting to discuss transparency and press access to their administration.
We, the people, should endorse that call to coverage by our independent “watchdogs on government.” In turn, journalists must take action to reverse a widespread view – 74 percent in the latest State of the First Amendment survey – that the news media is failing to live up to its responsibility to be accurate and unbiased in news reports or to, at the least, be transparent in declaring bias.
Holding government accountable in public for how public policy is made, and how public money is spent, would seem to be a nonpartisan objective on which we can all agree. In that same State of the First Amendment survey, 71 percent of us said that was the case.
We will need to keep in mind as a nation that discussion, dissent, disagreement and debate are the hallmarks of a strong and open system of self-governance – and provide the means for self-correction when this nation goes astray. Let’s consider how rare it is in the world to be able to assemble peaceably without fear of government persecution or prosecution, and to petition the government for change.
In like manner, there might be those who decried the “Women’s March” that followed the Inaugural Parade by one day as divisive. But what a grand example to other nations: Hundreds of thousands of Americans on one day, celebrating the peaceful transition of national power after a heated, closely contested election — only to be followed a single day later, in the same space, by hundreds of thousands of Americans protesting the political particulars of that transfer.
And finally, there’s certainly every reason to fear domestic and international terrorists. But we need to remember that targeting others solely because of their Muslim religious faith not only violates our nation’s unique commitment to respecting all faiths, but resurrects images of a time when unjustified wartime fear and disgraceful ethnic bias led us to intern Japanese Americans at the start if World War II.
More than ever, as we enter this new “Era of Trump,” we should heed the call to duty as citizens expressed in the observation by my late colleague John Seigenthaler that our First Amendment freedoms “are never safe, never secure, but always in the process of being made safe and secure.”
We might disagree – and often do – on how those five core freedoms of the First Amendment apply to any given set of facts.
But we should all stand behind them against any attempt to limit, weaken or ignore them on the basis of the variable political winds, the power of fear – or even the impact of the occasional presidential tweet.