Page 128

Fact-checking grows in popularity, importance

By Tori Sullivan,
Bulletin Correspondent

‘Fact-checking is hard. It takes time, but, more critically, no one wants you to do it. It would be easier for politicians to say whatever they want and not feel they will be called out on it.’

—Aaron Sharockman, Executive director
PolitiFact

2016 saw an election season filled with outlandish claims made by candidates all around the country trying to sway voters during their campaigns. At a time when the demand for fact-checking is at an all-time high, Aaron Sharockman, executive director of PolitiFact, told fellow journalists that “fact-checking works.”

Sharockman’s 75-minute presentation “Getting it right — fact checking for journalists” took place Friday, Feb. 24, on the first day of the New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention.

Fact-checking has been a hot topic recently in the news, and it was evident by the attendance at Sharockman’s presentation in the Boston Marriott Long Wharf hotel. In a room prepared with 60 chairs set up, additional seating was needed.

PolitiFact rates the accuracy of comments made by politicians and other public figures based on its “Truth-O-Meter.” The scale ranges from the standard true to false. Comments deemed to be the most untruthful are given the lowest rating on the scale, however: “Pants on Fire.”

The site was launched in 2007. It won the Pulitzer Prize for national reporting for coverage of the 2008 presidential election between then-U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, an Illinois Democrat, and U.S. Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican.

The site gained more popularity during the latest election, between now-President Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, for fact-checking comments made by both candidates during their campaigns. PolitiFact doesn’t examine only comments made during presidential campaigns. It also checks comments made at any level of government, from county officials to congressmen to the president, and even city council members.

“Lawmakers are scared of fact-checking,” but “audiences crave fact-checking,” Sharockman said.

Thirty percent of what is fact-checked by PolitiFact is based on suggestions made by readers.

Sharockman said fact-checking keeps elected officials from being able to say whatever they feel like saying, especially at a local level.

“Every newspaper should have fact-checking, and they don’t even need a scale,” Sharockman said.

Sharockman shared with the audience experiences he had in the past when he was told that his attendance at Florida campaign events affected what was said by the candidates.

PolitiFact was created and is primarily financed by the Tampa Bay (Fla.) Times, plus grants from nonpartisan organizations such as the Democracy Fund, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. The site recently began accepting reader donations.

Sharockman discussed the importance of PolitiFact’s staff of 10 writers and editors being nonpartisan.

“Accurate nonpartisan reporting is as important now as it has ever been,” he said.

The PolitiFact process begins after a writer researches a comment made by a public figure. A “Truth-O-Meter” story is then written and the comment is given a rating based on the scale. After the story is edited, three fellow staff members determine the accuracy of the “Truth-O-Meter” ruling. Sharockman estimates that on average PolitiFact fact-checks five comments a day.

“Fact-checking is hard. It takes time, but, more critically, no one wants you to do it. It would be easier for politicians to say whatever they want and not feel they will be called out on it,” he said.

NEWS

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘Accurate nonpartisan reporting is as important now as it has ever been.’

—Aaron Sharockman

‘Every newspaper should have fact-checking, and they don’t even need a scale.’

—Aaron Sharockman

The convention session on fact-checking drew an audience that outgrew the number of chairs originally set up to accommodate it
Share:

Caution, not fear, should shape attitudes toward threats of libel suits

By Jacob Sauberman,
Bulletin Correspondent

‘There is a culture out there … to put media outlets out of business. The best defense is good reporting.’

—Robert Bertsche, Lawyer
Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Boston

With a new presidential administration intent on a war with the press, it remains as important as ever for journalists to remain conscientious and vigilant about what they publish, according to Robert Bertsche, a lawyer with Prince Lobel Tye LLP of Boston and a former journalist.

In a session Friday, Feb. 24, at the New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention at the Boston Marriott Long Wharf hotel, Bertsche discussed the growing trend of defamation lawsuits and the fear it can impart on publications.

“There is a culture out there … to put media outlets out of business,” Bertsche told about 20 people who attended his “Defamation is back in style” session. “The best defense is good reporting.”

He opened his talk by defining libel: a false statement of fact published about an identifiable living person that tends to injure the reputation of that person, and published with a level of fault.

He illustrated the development of libel law via the “actual malice” standard, delving into a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. The New York Times ran an advertisement about a student protest in Alabama during the height of the civil rights movement. L.B. Sullivan, the chief of Alabama State Police, was not named in the advertisement but thought that the criticisms of the police were both inaccurate and indirectly aimed at him – and thus defamatory.

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the Times, and in doing so, established a precedent that the First Amendment protects publications in libel suits when writing about public officials and public figures, as long as their news reports are not written with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth.

Despite the ruling, the case revealed the dangers that a defamation lawsuit can bring, even to an industry giant.

“You’re liable in the print media for everything that you publish,” Bertsche warned. “If those (libel) awards (sought by the plaintiffs) were to get through the Supreme Court, the New York Times would have been put out of business.”

Bertsche then transitioned to the future state of libel law under President Donald Trump. On Feb. 26, 2016, Trump said: “We’re going to open up those libel laws. We’re going to have people sue you like you’ve never got sued before.”

Trump’s history with lawsuits has been well-documented, Bertsche said.

“Trump has filed 4,000 lawsuits over the last 30 years …,” he said.

Bertsche said the simple threat of a lawsuit is enough to scare many publications that might not have the resources to engage in a legal battle.

Many media companies are thinking “let’s not go there, let’s not bait this lion,” Bertsche said.

The threat is always imminent, considering how easy it is to be sued in today’s quick-trigger society, he said.

“Who can be sued? Everybody can be sued,” Bertsche warned. “It’s simple, and I can see myself making this mistake, easily.”

He was referring to a case in which a reporter accidentally put the wrong street address of a man convicted of a break-in. The newspaper that published the story was sued for defamation and was ordered to pay the defendant $60,000 for damaging his reputation.

“I’m sorry, I can imagine being her,” Bertsche said. “(We think) what are the odds? … These lawsuits happen when you don’t expect them … The human imagination to defame someone is unlimited.”

Bertsche outlined the classification categories for a claim of defamation: “loathsome” disease, criminal activity, financial embarrassment, and lack of chastity. Several so-called “defamation buzzwords” that are known to detonate lawsuits include blackmail, slumlord, scab, insolvent and sexual abuser.

That last one brought Bertsche back to Trump, who threatened to sue The New York Times over a story about two women who claimed to have been inappropriately touched by Trump. When sent a cease-and-desist letter by Trump’s lawyers for apparent “libelous” and “reckless” content, the Times responded: “We did what the law allows: We published newsworthy information about a subject of deep public concern.”

No suit was filed.

Bertsche drew a lesson from the Times’ act of defiance, leaving his audience with an important reminder.

“We have to be careful, but we can’t be afraid,” he said. “Remember why you got into the business.”

LEGAL

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘We have to be careful, but we can’t be afraid. Remember why you got into this business.’

—Robert Bertsche

Members of the audience at the discussion on defamation pay rapt attention.
Share:

New Hall of Famers urge questioning of authority, persistence vs. adversity

By Bailey Knecht,
Bulletin Correspondent

As the six new members of the New England Newspaper Hall of Fame were inducted Friday, Feb. 24, they all espoused the value in questioning authority and persisting in the face of adversity.

A dedication to print journalism and local news also was emphasized by the newest Hall of Fame members as they were inducted in a ceremony attended by about 75 people.

Inducted were Eliot White of the Record-Journal Publishing Company, based in Meriden, Conn.; Marcia Green of The Valley Breeze newspaper group, based in Lincoln, R.I.; Martin Langeveld of New England Newspapers Inc., based in Pittsfield, Mass.; Candace Page of The Burlington (Vt.) Free Press and Seven Days of Burlington; Bob Ryan of The Boston Globe; Albert B. Southwick of the Telegram & Gazette of Worcester, Mass.

Eliot White

White is president and publisher of the family-owned Record-Journal Publishing Company, whose flagship newspaper is the Record-Journal of Meriden and which has been in business for 150 years. He has also served on the New England Newspaper and Press Association board of directors.

In his acceptance speech, White emphasized his company’s dedication to developing its employees into skilled journalists.

“As a news organization, the Record-Journal has tried to create an environment that promotes quality journalism by hiring good people and giving them the resources and training and support necessary to do their job,” he said.

He also discussed the need for journalists to hold higher powers accountable.

“As we know, it is more important than ever to keep government in the open with strong investigative journalism. Our future continues to be good, local community news,” he said. “What we do every day is important for our local communities and essential for a strong democracy.”

Marcia Green

Green has been editor in chief for the past 21 years at The Valley Breeze newspaper group, based in Lincoln, R.I., and publisher of its flagship newspaper, The Valley Breeze in three editions, and two sister newspapers, all in Rhode Island.

She formerly was a reporter and city editor of The Times of Pawtucket, R.I. In 2014, she was inducted into The Rev. William Blackstone Society for her impact on the Blackstone River Valley community.

Green called the Hall of Fame induction a “humbling honor.”

“I think (journalism) is important work, and I’ve happily dedicated my career to it,” she said.

She said that, although the technology has changed, the goal of journalists remains the same as when she began her career in the field.

“The tools today are vastly better, but we write the same stories, and continue to write the same stories that touch everyday life,” she said. “I have been more than honored to carry the news of our Northern Rhode Island communities, and I’m grateful for a career to be paid as a storyteller.”

Martin Langeveld

Langeveld was employed in the newspaper industry for 30 years before he retired in 2008 as publisher of Pittsfield, Mass.-based New England Newspapers Inc., publisher of The Berkshire Eagle of Pittsfield, and of the Brattleboro Reformer, the Bennington Banner and the Manchester Journal, all in Vermont. He then began a blog, News after Newspapers, and contributed to the Nieman Journalism Lab website.

In 2016, he returned on an interim basis as publisher of New England Newspapers for about five months. He is now on the New England Newspapers’ board of directors.

“After being out of the business for a while, then coming back into it, it was really a pleasant surprise to discover that there really was still a lot of energy, a lot of dedication and a lot of creativity, and just a great crew of people to come and work with,” he said. “The chance to do this, to be involved in this transition, really turned out to be one of the most personally rewarding things that I’ve ever done.”

Langeveld said he considers the New England Newspaper Hall of Fame honor to be a proud ending to his news career.

“Now I’ve capped (my career) with this induction into the Hall of Fame, which I never really expected,” he said. “It’s a great honor.”

Candace Page

Page was a reporter for the Burlington Free Press for more than 30 years whose reporting focused on the environment. She retired in 2013 but continues to serve as an editor and a mentor to reporters at the weekly Seven Days of Burlington.

Page was a reporter at The Providence (R.I.) Journal in the 1970s, which she said is where she developed her passion for journalism.

“I became a reporter in 1973-74 during Watergate, when journalism was a cause and a calling, not just a job or a career,” she said. “Holding government accountable was a heroic pursuit, not just to journalists, but to our audience at that time … I believed in the importance of what I was doing.”

She said questioning authority was one of her primary goals as a reporter.

“I’d really like to think of tonight, and this honor for me, which I am deeply appreciative of, as a way of honoring the values that we all feel about our mutual calling,” she said. “The importance of reporting the facts, casting a skeptical and questioning eye on authority of all kind, and speaking truth to power — I certainly hope that that’s a cause that I have served in my time. It’s reaffirming to understand that there are people here who still want to do that.”

Bob Ryan

Ryan began writing for The Boston Globe’s sports section in 1968 and continued until his formal retirement in 2012. He continues to write columns most Sundays for the Globe. He also has written 12 books and has made numerous radio and television appearances throughout his career.

In his acceptance speech, Ryan expressed his commitment to print journalism.

“I cannot live without newspapers; that’s who I am,” he said. “And though I now am known for anybody out there in the great beyond under 40, or maybe even under 50, because of my presence on television, I can assure you that when I get up in the morning and look in the mirror, I see a writer, a newspaper writer.”

He said the Globe was the perfect place for him to learn and grow as a writer.

“We were given the freedom to be creative,” he said. “We were given the chance to stretch our journalistic wings.”

Ryan also said that he felt fortunate for the opportunities he had during his career.

“We all know that our business is under siege and in peril, and who knows what the future is going to be? I just know this — I’m very grateful that I did it when I did it and where I did it, that’s for sure,” he said.

Albert B. Southwick

Southwick is well-known for his role at the Telegram & Gazette, where he continues to write a weekly column at age 96 after retiring in 1985 from his full-time job there as chief editorial writer, a position he had held since 1968.

He began his employment at the Telegram & Gazette in the early 1940s before serving in the Navy during World War II, then returning to the Telegram & Gazette in 1952.

Southwick joked about his retirement, noting his continued contributions to the Telegram & Gazette.

“I retired in 1985,” he said. “Let this be a warning to you. I don’t know why you retire at 62 or 65 or 67 — you probably have 30 or 40 years ahead of you.”

Like Ryan, Southwick said he was grateful to have worked in the field when he did.

“I was lucky,” he said. “It was a time when people made money (in) print journalism, which is getting harder and harder to do.”

Southwick stressed the need for solid journalism in the current political climate.

“I’ve had a very satisfying career in a profession I love, providing facts and thought to our readers,” he said. “Good journalism is more important than ever in this era of alternative facts and social media misinformation. Pursuing the truth and reporting it accurately is going to be a continuing challenge.”

NEW ENGLAND NEWSPAPER HALL OF FAME

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘What we do every day is important for our local communities and essential for a strong democracy.’

—Eliot White, President and publisher
Record-Journal Publishing Company, Meriden, Conn.

‘The tools today are vastly better, but we write the same stories, and continue to write the same stories that touch everyday life.’

—Marcia Green, Editor in chief
Valley Breeze newspaper group, Lincoln, R.I.

‘After being out of the business for a while, then coming back into it, it was really a pleasant surprise to discover that there really was still a lot of energy, a lot of dedication and a lot of creativity, and just a great crew of people to come and work with.’

—Martin Langevald, Board member, retired publisher
New England Newspapers Inc., Pittsfield, Mass.

‘I’d really like to think of tonight, and this honor for me, which I am deeply appreciative of, as a way of honoring the values that we all feel about our mutual calling.’

—Candace Page
Retired reporter, Burlington (Vt.) Free Press
Editor and mentor, Seven Days, Burlington, Vt.

‘We all know that our business is under seige and in peril, and who knows what the future is going to be. I just know this – I’m very grateful that I did it when I did it and where I did it, that’s for sure.’

—Bob Ryan, Sports columnist, retired sportswriter
Boston Globe

‘Good journalism is more important than ever in this era of alternative facts and social media misinformation. Pursuing the truth and reporting it accurately is going to be a continuing challenge.’

—Albert B. Southwick, Columnist, retired chief editorial writer
Telegram & Gazette, Worcester, Mass.

The audience at the Hall of Fame dinner enjoyed the acceptance speech delivered by Southwick, at bottom right.
Share:

‘Great Ideas’: Creativity and diversified product lines sell more ads, local publishers say

By Alex Eng,
Bulletin Correspondent

‘We found, as a council, that while we’re rapidly trying to grow our digital franchise, we’re leaving our print franchise in the dust. We’re ignoring those customers.’

—Mark French, Advertising director
The Republican, Springfield, Mass.

Mark French and his advertising colleagues conducted their presentation as a working, interactive session with their audience.

Local publishers and salespeople discussed new strategies to raise advertising and other revenue for local newspapers, at a discussion organized by the New England Newspaper and Press Association’s Marketing and Advertising Council.

After soliciting ad and revenue-raising ideas from local newspapers since last fall, the Marketing and Advertising Council put together a “Thriving Not Surviving: Great Ideas Survey Results” booklet and used it as a basis for the discussion on new ad ideas for local newspapers.

The discussion, titled “Thrive; Don’t Just Survive!”, was led by Mark French, advertising director at The Republican of Springfield, Mass., and centered around new approaches to print newspaper ad sales amid the rise of digital content. The discussion took place at NENPA’s winter convention in the Boston Marriott Long Wharf hotel.

“We found, as a council, that while we’re rapidly trying to grow our digital franchise, we’re leaving our print franchise in the dust,” French said. “We’re ignoring those customers.”

French said print ad salespeople need to revisit their rates and product lines and to make sure that sales staffs are aware of all the different ad products their newspapers sell to clients.

The discussion, attended by about 70 people, included a few novel strategies that successfully led to increased ad revenue at various New England newspapers.

One strategy was reaching out to nonprofits and pitching ad sales as helping those organizations reach large audiences captured by local dailies and weeklies across the region in a way that could not be done by nonprofits alone.

For example, the Republican partnered with the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame to run ads targeting local and professional basketball teams 125 days in advance of the Hall of Fame’s celebration of the 125th anniversary of the invention of basketball by physical education instructor James Naismith in Springfield. French said the Republican took advantage of the paper’s circulation to convince the nonprofit that partnering with the Republican would be less expensive and more useful in reaching a large audience than doing so itself.

French said that because nonprofits can apply for certain state and federal grants based on the nature of the services they provide, the nonprofits can obtain government aid to offset the cost of purchasing ad buys with newspapers.

“If you can get those funds with a nonprofit, and work out a program, then they can get state funds in return,” French said.

French included that possibility when pitching the ad buy to the Basketball Hall of Fame, which brings in significant tourism revenue for the state. In the end, the Republican’s Hall of Fame ad pitch paid off to the tune of $67,000.

French said ad salespeople need to improve the creativity of their product lines in addition to expanding those lines beyond the traditional quarter-, half-, or full-page print ads priced by the inch.

“You cannot approach your traditional print advertisements the way you used to 10, 20, or 30 years ago,” French said, instead suggesting that papers offer fixed-price advertising packages.

He said ad rates, especially those that haven’t been revisited by sales staffs in a while, are often too high.

Moreover, charging clients based on traditional rate cards is anachronistic, and papers should offer more updated ad packages, said Terry Carlisle, general manager of The Ellsworth (Maine) American.

“Rate cards are just ridiculous,” Carlisle said.

The American switched from charging clients based on rate cards to offering clients all-inclusive ad packages of various price levels, charged monthly as opposed to per inch and per ad. For example, one monthly subscription-based ad package includes weekly print ads, a color ad once a month, and a 40-percent-off discount on special sections typically charged by section.

Simplifying the buy process made the purchasing process easier for clients, which actually allowed the paper to raise its prices, Carlisle said.

Another example of upgrading ad product lines is for papers to provide clients with more services beyond just publishing print ads or hosting ads on their websites.

Walter Coffey, director of digital sales at the Boston Herald, found a new way to approach tourism ads with diversified packages. The Herald recently promoted travel to Vermont heavily in its Travel and Road Trip sections, and advertised Vermont-made products such as hand-crafted wooden bowls and maple syrup as well as Vermont-based bed and breakfasts and other businesses. Coffey said the Herald is continuing to add new products to its ad lines, including social media campaigns and a question-and-answer session on the Herald’s online radio station to discuss notable breweries, restaurants, and other tourist destinations in Vermont.

Those attending the discussion were given free copies of the “Thriving Not Surviving: Great Ideas Survey Results” booklet.

Some ideas proposed offering magazine-style sections to non-traditional advertisers, hosting local photo and giveaway contests, such as giving away teddy bears to customers visiting certain businesses on Valentine’s Day, and promoting organizational anniversaries and events.

French said sales staffs, besides offering new types of products with new types of payment models, need to have a culture shift toward innovation and increased creativity in coming up with new products that entice clients to buy ads.

“One of the worst things that you can have in your organization is someone that’s just hanging on,” French said, referring to salespeople who have no desire to embrace new ways of selling new products. “Make sure with your organization that you promote this culture.”

French said the best thing ad sales teams could do is to use creativity to devise attractive products and services for clients.

“Get really, really, creative,” French said. “If you are creative, and you take that to the market, you will thrive.”

ADVERTISING

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘Rate cards are just ridiculous.’

—Terry Carlisle, General manager
Ellsworth (Maine) American

‘Get really, really creative. If you are creative, and you take that to the market, you will thrive.’

—Mark French

Share:

Tiptoeing through the minefields inherent at community newspapers

By Gianna Barberia,
Bulletin Correspondent

“We’ll be sharing our war stories,” Earl Brechlin, editor of the Mount Desert Islander of Bar Harbor, Maine, said to a laughing audience.

Brechlin was not describing the war on terror or even President Donald Trump’s newly declared “running war with the media.”

Brechlin was describing the ongoing and often tedious struggles between community newspapers and their communities.

Brechlin spoke on a panel with Paul Miller, executive editor of the Keene (N.H.) Sentinel, and Rod Doherty, former executive editor of Foster’s Daily Democrat of Dover, N.H., at the New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention.

The panel discussion, which took place at the Boston Marriott Long Wharf hotel Saturday, Feb. 25, was titled “Heart and backbone of community journalism.” About 70 people attended.

The discussion focused on major difficulties community newspapers consistently face, with the biggest involving keeping and maintaining relationships and attempts to bribe journalists.

Doherty, now retired, described a story from his early newspaper days when he interviewed a chef at a vocational school. Doherty said the chef later opened a restaurant near the newspaper where Doherty was a reporter and which he and his colleagues frequented. Doherty became friends with the chef; the chef occasionally bought him beers and provided him with Patriots tickets, Doherty said. The chef eventually made a special request of Doherty, he said.

“He said, ‘I’m running for city council, and I need you to write good stories for me to help me get elected,’” Doherty recalled.

Doherty said that, at the time, he was confused and told the chef that he could not do that, and the chef replied: “What did you think all those beers and tickets were for?”

“It was enlightening,” Doherty said. “I was being bribed, and I didn’t even know it!”

Brechlin described his own attempted bribery story, in which he was offered tickets to travel to Key West in exchange for a good review.

“Certainly, you can’t take that,” Brechlin said.

Although the audience chuckled at the anecdotes, the three panelists reminded the audience that you can never accept gifts or services from any news sources, because it is a conflict of interest.

“You can’t afford to make a mistake,” Doherty said.

Bribes are not the only dilemma community journalists face, however.

Many journalists struggle with maintaining friendships and relationships while doing their job.

After the local fire chief proposed hiring two additional firefighters, the Keene Sentinel looked into firefighter salaries, finding that many firefighters made large chunks of money in overtime pay, Miller said. As a result, the Keene Sentinel decided to publish the salaries of all of the firefighters in the county, a decision Miller said he found personally hard because of his relationships within the department.

“I had two really close friends in the fire department staff,” Miller said. “When that story came out and was published, let’s just say we didn’t have any friends in the fire department.”

Doherty said he had few friends when he was a reporter, and that he found it hard not to strain relationships through his work, even with those closest to him.

“My son was in the police log; I didn’t cut it. My wife was in an accident; we ran the story,” Doherty said. “Was it pleasant? No.”

Doherty said those doing newspaper work are journalists first, and that you need to relay that to those with whom you are friendly.

Miller said: “You just have to know that there’s the potential down the road to hold (your friends) accountable for something.”

Brechlin said: “News and readers come first. Then, you can worry about patching up relationships.”

Although the atmosphere at the panel discussion was mostly lighthearted, many audience members voiced serious concerns.

One woman said that because she reports in the town where she grew up, she finds it hard to be taken seriously as a reporter by officials who have known her and her family for years.

“Publish their salaries and then they’ll take you seriously,” Brechlin joked.

The panelists said journalists need to command authority and respect.

“They need to know you’re a person who would hold people accountable,” Miller said. “Your primary job is serving the people.”

Miller concluded the workshop by giving the audience some advice and assurance: “Don’t underestimate the power of the newspaper, no matter your circulation.”

MANAGEMENT

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘You just have to know that there’s the potential down the road to hold (your friends) accountable for something.’

—Paul Miller, Executive editor
Keene (N.H.) Sentinel

‘News and readers come first. Then, you can worry about patching up relationships.’

—Earl Brechlin, Editor
Mount Desert Islander, Bar Harbor, Maine

‘It was enlightening. I was being bribed, and I didn’t even know it!’

—Rod Doherty, Former executive editor
Foster’s Daily Democrat, Dover, N.H.

‘Dont’ underestimate the power of the newspaper, no matter your circulation.’

—Paul Miller

Part of the audience of about 70 people at the convention session on ‘Heart and backbone of community journalism.’
Share:

Henninger’s cardinal sin of news design: Being dull

By Ryan Grewal,
Bulletin Correspondent

‘Violate any of my other advice before you be dull. If you’re dull, you’re signing your own death warrant. You’re telling people, “Don’t bother next time.”‘

—Ed Henninger, Director
Henninger Consulting, Rock Hill, S.C.

Although small publications often deal with issues more pressing than font choices or negative space, Ed Henninger, an independent newspaper design consultant, advised them to have aspirations beyond their modest circulation and find inspiration in the timeless designs of iconic magazines and newspapers.

“Look to the greats,” Henninger said. “I look to Elle Magazine if I want to get inspiration for typography, visuals, photos or just overall design.”

Henninger, director of Henninger Consulting in Rock Hill, S.C., outlined his guidelines for designing with limited resources in a spirited presentation titled “Designing your niche publications,” held Friday, Feb. 24, at the New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention.

One of the most important elements of design for print publications is the nameplate, Henninger said.

“Create a great nameplate,” he said. “Not an ‘eh’ nameplate, not just one that’ll do, not one that has to go through a committee of nine people, seven of whom are visually brain-dead.”

Henninger displayed examples of the nameplates of local niche publications, including Hartford (Conn.) Magazine, Marblehead (Mass.) Magazine, and Worcester (Mass.) Magazine. Designers and editors from some niche publications, including VT Ski+Ride magazine, based in Middlebury, Vt., and Stowe (Vt.) Guide and Magazine, were in the audience of about 25 people as Henninger critiqued their designs.

Niche publications often make the mistake of abandoning good nameplates in favor of seasonal kitsch, Henninger noted.

“Don’t think ‘Oh, it’s wintertime, let’s use that snow font,'” he said. “No, no, no, no, no. We’re not going there.”

In consulting for smaller newspapers and magazines, Henninger sometimes encounters misuse of formatting software.

“If I could have a cup of coffee with the guys who create (Adobe) inDesign, I would ask them to make an administrator-level inDesign so you can’t do things like squeeze type,” he said. “I’m dealing with a client now who sent me his inDesign pages … with headlines squeezed to 65 percent.”

Henninger’s session included a lengthy discussion of typeface choices, beginning with Henninger polling the audience on what fonts they use in their publications.

“Oh, wow, I’m really not happy to hear that (you use Arial),” Henninger told an audience member. “Arial is, to me, characterless and lifeless.”

He offered suggestions for different display typefaces, including Berthold Akzidenz-Grotesk.

“It is neither an accident, nor is it grotesque,” he said. “I’ve used it a lot.”

Closing out the session by noting his many pet peeves, Henninger advised the audience to remember the little things that improve the reader’s experience.

“Steve Jobs once said, ‘Design is not about how it looks, it’s about how it works,’” Henninger said. “Putting page numbers in the same place on every page is how it works.”

His biggest grievance is with dull design. The only unforgivable sin in newspaper and magazine layout is being dull, Henninger said.

“Violate any of my other advice before you be dull,” he said. “If you’re dull, you’re signing your own death warrant. You’re telling people, ‘Don’t bother next time.’ ”

DESIGN

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘Look to the greats. I look to Elle Magazine if I want to get inspiration for typography, visuals, photos or just overall design.’

—Ed Henninger

Henninger’s animated design discussion prompted questions from his audience.
Share:

Develop sources with trust, nurture them with fairness

By Alejandro Serrano
and Nadine El-Bawab,
Bulletin Correspondent

Panelist Stephen Kurkjian, center, shares a laugh with fellow panelists Kevin Landrigan and Anne Karolyi.

For Stephen Kurkjian, a three-time Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter, dealing with a source is a lot like an arm-wrestling match.

“It is important you conduct yourself with professional(ism) and graciousness,” he said at a panel discussion Saturday, Feb. 25, on “A Source Guide: How to choose, reach and max out your news sources” at the New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention.

The match is about balance between giving and getting, Kurkjian said. Terms of engagement should be set at the beginning of the relationship, as a reporter tiptoes the line of almost being friends with a source, while carefully avoiding actually being one.

He advised being prepared before meeting with a source and making sure never to promise a source a flattering story.

Kurkjian, a retired investigative reporter for The Boston Globe, was one of four panelists. The others were Shelley Murphy, a Boston Globe reporter who shared in the Globe staff’s Pulitzer Prize for breaking-news coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings; Kevin Landrigan, a veteran, award-winning political reporter now with the New Hampshire Union Leader of Manchester; and Anne Karolyi, managing editor of the Republican-American of Waterbury, Conn., which won the top prize for large daily newspapers at the convention’s news awards ceremony that night.

The panelists used personal experiences in discussing how to work with difficult sources and cultivate lasting relationships on a beat.

Karolyi discussed the Republican-American’s policy of avoiding the use of anonymous sources. She said the only rare exceptions to the Republican-American’s policy include an overriding importance for the public to know something or if every other way of obtaining the same information on the record had been tried to no avail.

An anonymous source can be a great starting point for a reporter, but the reporter must fact-check the information, whether by obtaining a public record or obtaining the information from another source who will speak on the record, she said.

“It does make it harder,” Karolyi said. “It’s not fatal, just much more work.”

Karolyi said many journalists at the Republican-American have gone on to well-known news organizations, and those reporters have told her that being forced to work harder to back up their stories made them better reporters.

Murphy said the Globe doesn’t like unidentified or confidential sources, and neither does the public. She said, however, that sometimes a reporter must promise a source confidentiality because of the nature of a story. But generally, the only promise a reporter should make is that a story will be fair, Murphy said.

“I make sure that people know this is what I am writing,” Murphy said. “I never promise anyone a favorable story, but I promise them that it will be fair.”

Murphy cautioned those in the audience to avoid being used as a reporter.

Being a reporter is “all built on trust,” Murphy said.

Kurkjian said too that trust is integral to reporting stories fairly. A reporter must get to know the source and let the source know that the reporter cares and respects the source, and that the reporter expects that to be reciprocated by being trusted to get a story right, he said.

“That’s what the weekends are for,” he said about learning the jargon some sources use.

The more than 65 people who attended the discussion were encouraged to participate in the discussion. An audience member asked the panelists how to penetrate and cover a police department that is reluctant to provide information to the press.

Kurkjian returned to his point of trust and fairness.

“You’re the most important person in the town – not the chief,” he said.

Murphy suggested seeking out police officers “who have been disciplined because they are usually the ones who are unhappy,” and that there are always people in the police department “that want to talk; tell them that they can trust you.”

Maneuvering through different sources who are connected to a hard-to-reach source might help in getting that difficult source to talk with a reporter, said Landrigan, who in covering New Hampshire’s presidential primaries has interviewed every president since 1980.

Sometimes asking sources you are on good terms with to reach out to the difficult source might also help, he said.

Reporters should acquaint themselves with their state’s shield laws, which allow a journalist to keep confidential sources confidential. Landrigan said that when he is reporting in New Hampshire, he can promise a source confidentiality, but he can’t promise that he won’t face court action if he refuses to identify a confidential source.

Nonetheless, he said a story shouldn’t hinge on one unidentified source and that if someone’s top concern is confidentiality, then he or she isn’t very committed to releasing information and the reporter should find more sources.

The workshop shed light on the balance Kurkjian mentioned when comparing the use of sources to an arm-wrestling match.

“It is a match of wits … but always handle yourself professionally,” he said.

(A handout with 10 tips for dealing with news sources was distributed to audience members after the panel discussion ended.)

NEWS

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘It is a match of wits … but always handle yourself professionally.’ 

—Stephen Kurkjian, Retired investigative reporter
Boston Globe

‘I never promise anyone a favorable story, but I promise them that it will be fair.’ 

—Shelley Murphy, Reporter
Boston Globe

Anne Karolyi

Fellow panelists listen as Kevin Landrigan makes a point to audience members, some of whom took notes and asked questions.

Share:

How to bring sensitivity to reporting on kids in crisis

By Morgan Mapstone,
Bulletin Correspondent

Reporting on child-related crises requires being both a journalist and a human being, according to Jennifer Berry Hawes.

Hawes, projects reporter at the Post and Courier of Charleston, S.C., and winner of the 2015 Pulitzer Prize for public service, was one of three panelists at a workshop Friday, Feb. 24, titled “For the sake of the children … Reporting responsibly on kids in crisis.”

About 25 people attended the workshop at the New England Newspaper and Press Association winter convention. The discussion, moderated by John Voket, associate editor of The Newtown (Conn.) Bee, explored the challenges and solutions to reporting on kids after traumatic events.

As a reporter during a Charleston church mass shooting in 2015 that resulted in a man’s killing nine victims, Hawes has experienced the impact press coverage can have on the lives of young victims. In her eyes, kids aren’t being protected as they should be in reporting today.

“There used to be a day when stories went straight to archives,” Hawes said. “That stuff is out there forever now.”

Panelist Lisa Jones, a research associate professor of psychology at the Crimes against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, discussed responses to news reports.

“When a youth is reported in an article, it is an involuntary disclosure,” Jones said.

Jones said that whenever a news story discloses information, the subject of the story gets both positive and negative responses back from the public. Jones said that, in her experience, negative responses tend to overshadow positive responses victims receive, affecting a young child throughout his or her future.

A victim’s identity sometimes is not protected in reports long after the incident occurs. Jones discussed the decision to disclose information and its continuing effect on a victim’s well-being in future reporting.

“It’s important to remember there is also decision-making needed months and years after the event,” Jones said.

Panelist Robert Franks, president and chief executive officer of Judge Baker Children’s Center in Boston, discussed the state of mind of a child after a life-altering event.

“You’re dealing with someone with a significant loss of control,” Franks said.

After life-changing trauma, victims can experience post-traumatic stress disorders. Memories of the event can be re-lived when triggered by traumatic reminders. Franks said the way journalists cover stories can contribute to those traumatic reminders.

“As journalists, we don’t think of trauma as the long-term disease it is,” Franks said. “Everyone responds differently to trauma.”

Panelists gave advice on the use of different interviewing methods to avoid harming the mindset of a victim.

Hawes said she does all of her interviews on the record, but offers an option to the person being interviewed to contact her with any concerns after the interview. That option gives authority to a victim who has lost a sense of control, she said.

“I tell the person I’m interviewing ‘If you feel uncomfortable with any of the information you give me after the interview, tell me’,” Hawes said.

She thinks that the most effective way to approach someone after a traumatic event is to talk to someone in common with the victim.

“I try to reach out to people through a trusted friend,” Hawes said. “It gives a buffer and encourages the victim to trust and cooperate.”

NEWS

2017-New-England-Newspaper-Convention-logo

‘As journalists, we don’t think of trauma as the long-term disease it is. Everyone responds differently to trauma.’

—Robert Franks, President, chief executive officer
Judge Baker Children’s Center

‘I tell the person I’m interviewing “If you feel uncomfortable with any of the information you give me after the interview, tell me.”‘

—Jennifer Berry Hawes, Projects reporter
Post and Courier, Charleston, S.C.

Lisa Jones

The audience of about 25 people listens to the panel on ‘For the sake of the children … Reporting responsibly on kids in crisis.’

Share:

Industry News – Mar 2017

Newspaper-industry-news

Mobile/Online News

Social Media News

Legal Briefs

Industry News

Share:

A ‘meticulous’ dissection of that word’s meaning

Jim Stasiowski, writing coach
Jim Stasiowski, writing coach

Jim Stasiowski, writing

Writing coach Jim Stasiowski welcomes your questions or comments.

Call him at
(775) 354-2872
or write to:
2499 Ivory Ann Drive
Sparks, NV 89436.

If I call you “a meticulous journalist,” will you smile or slug me?

To me, “meticulous” means extremely careful, being certain each step is researched and considered thoroughly. Meticulous reporters and editors deserve raises.

The Webster’s New World College Dictionary, Fifth Edition, recognized by the Associated Press Stylebook as the authority, mostly agrees, but adds ominous nuances: “extremely or excessively careful about details; scrupulous or finicky.”

According to Webster’s, “meticulous” is derived from the Latin “meticulosus,” meaning “fearful, and “metus,” meaning “fear.”

How do we go from “fearful” to “extremely … careful about details”?

I usually focus on how to make your reporting and writing better, but I’m reading a biography of Charles Darwin – yeah, that natural-selection guy, not the pinball-machine repairman – so I’m at the moment captivated by evolution.

In 1926, Henry Watson Fowler, an Englishman whose obsession with the language must have made him an extremely cranky dinner-party guest, published the first “A Dictionary of Modern English Usage,” known now by the shorthand name “Fowler’s.”

I own a reprinted version of that first edition. The frontispiece declares the book was reprinted 17 times, the last in 1959. Two of the reprints – in 1930 and 1937 – included “corrections,” so it’s impossible to tell whether the volume I have (it once belonged to “Miss Kay Huffman,” according to her prim cursive signature) has H.W.’s original opinion of “meticulous,” but considering the vituperation in the entry, I’m going to stick with my theory that only an obsessed Englishman raised to take on faith the God-bestowed invincibility of the British Empire could be so amusingly arch:

What is the strange charm that makes this wicked word irresistible to the British journalist? … (I)t means not what the journalists make it mean, but just “frightened”; it is the word for the timid hare, or the man who is gibbering with fear … the word died out. When it was resuscitated in the nineteenth century, it was by the literary critics with a new sense for which it was not in the least needed, “scrupulous” & “punctilious” being amply sufficient … The question is whether we are going to allow the word to be imposed upon us for general use, now that the journalist of the daily papers has caught it up from the literary critic.

Although I’m sorely tempted, I shall skip my heartfelt “Harrumph!” about his scorn for “the daily papers”; instead, let’s trace how “meticulous” evolved from H.W.’s acidulous 1926 defense of the original meaning.

In 1965, Theodore M. Bernstein, onetime emperor of style at The New York Times, wrote in his book “The Careful Writer”: “The word does not mean careful or even very careful. … ‘(M)eticulous’ means timorously careful or overcareful. The misuses, arising from a desire to use the fancy word, are common.”

But a year later, “Modern American Usage,” a work attributed to Wilson Follett, rebutted the imperious Bernstein: “‘(M)eticulous’ has lost its overtone of fear and come to seem the right word for ‘exceedingly careful.’”

In 1968, S.I. Hayakawa’s “Use the Right Word: Modern Guide to Synonyms” backed Bernstein: “‘Meticulous’ suggests an almost finicky concern, often about trivial matters, based on a fear of making an error.”

But while “fear” was fading, the criticism represented by “exceedingly” in Follett and “finicky” in Hayakawa was emerging.

In a 1980 version of “American Usage and Style: The Consensus,” revered wordsmith Roy H. Copperud cited Bernstein’s interpretation that “meticulous” meant “care prompted by timidity or fear,” but then noted that dictionaries either ruled “the connotation of timidity obsolete” or simply left out that meaning.

“The consensus,” Copperud wrote, “is overwhelming that the word now means ‘painstaking, fussy,’ and may have a positive as well as a faintly disparaging sense.”

How, I must ask, can we reconcile “fussy” with “positive,” and “positive” with “faintly disparaging”?

Even the original sense dies hard, if you pay attention to the entry for “meticulous” in the 1994 edition of “Usage and Abusage”: “(P)roperly it implies excess of care and an overscrupulousness caused by timidity; but the modern favourable sense is appropriate everywhere except in the most formal writing.”

Pure pussyfooting.

By 1996, with H.W. Fowler insulated (by his 1933 death) against such apostasy, the Third Edition of Fowler’s surrendered: “(T)he word is now routinely used to mean ‘careful, punctilious, scrupulous, precise.’ It is a useful word.”

But Fowler’s’ backtracking – the same conclusions are in 2015’s Fourth Edition – wasn’t the final word. Witty, erudite Bill Bryson in 2002 published “Bryson’s Dictionary of Troublesome Words,” in which he says, “Several usage books, though fewer and fewer dictionaries, insist (meticulous) does not mean merely very careful, but rather excessively so. Correctly used, it has a pejorative tone. … (U)nless you mean to convey a negative quality, it is usually better to use ‘scrupulous,’ ‘careful,’ ‘painstaking,’ or some other synonym.”

Bryson deserves the last laugh: “Meticulous today is so often misused by respected writers … that to object is itself perhaps a somewhat meticulous act.”

Share: