Campaigns are in full swing as Election Day nears. Editors should pay extra attention to letters that give a thumbs up or thumbs down to candidates and other ballot initiatives.

Letter-writing campaigns have become as sophisticated and strategic as advertising campaigns. An unfortunate result is that many newspapers now charge for election-related letters. I appreciate the arguments for enacting the policy. It’s still disappointing, and I respectfully disagree.

The policy is perplexing as editors often bemoan the lack of reader interaction on opinion pages. Then, when election season swings around and letters naturally ramp up, newspapers limit debate to “paid opinions” only.

The pros and cons of paid letters could consume an entire discussion, but I pose one question as newspapers contemplate, and implement the policy: Where do you draw the line? Orchestrated letter-writing campaigns occur year-round on a variety of issues before local policy-making bodies. Are you accepting only “paid opinions” in these instances as well? It’s a surefire way to squelch the lively exchange of opinions and vibrant community conversation.

That debate aside, editors can and should diligently enforce letter policies – and even take extra steps – during election season. Here are a few guidelines to consider. Newsrooms should brainstorm to tailor policies to their circumstances:

Edit in ample proportions. For starters, it’s a good bet that the introductory and concluding paragraphs can be eliminated from most election letters. From there, feel free to edit aggressively for redundancy. The delete button on your keyboard should receive an extra workout as election day nears.

Limit the frequency and length of letters. Consider restrictions beyond normal letter policies. For example, limit individuals to one letter for the primary election campaign and one for the general election, or one letter per race for individuals weighing in on several contests. Set a word limit and make a few exceptions without strong justification. A lot can be conveyed in, say, 300 words.

Verify. Confirm all letters, preferably with a phone call. Be wary of letters coming from the same e-mail address, FAX number, or other social media account.

Set parameters for responses. The letters column is typically used to respond to issues raised in stories, editorials, and other letters. Letters usually should not be a forum for candidates to react to paid ads. The best guideline is that candidates respond to the message in the same avenue as the original message. There may be exceptions; an ad that contains misinformation or is terribly misleading may warrant a response in the letters column.

Establish deadlines. Deadlines are necessary to allow ample opportunity to debate issues. Set a separate deadline for letters that raise new issues. Publicize deadlines early and often.

Identify authors where appropriate. Some circumstances dictate that newspapers identify authors by position or relationship to a candidate. For example, school district business managers may write why it’s in their best interests to support a school levy referendum, or campaign managers might respond to criticism leveled against their candidates.

Set ground rules for rebuttals. Election season invariably produces letter-writing volleys. Don’t be afraid of implementing reasonable ground rules; it’s in the best interests of readers. A good rule of thumb – even in standing letter policies – is to limit each individual to an original letter and one rebuttal. Then kindly direct them to a private conversation. Dismiss any complaints that the other person had the last word; that will always be the case.

As an Eagle Scout, I always reacquaint myself with the Boy Scout Law during election season. I have memorized the credo: “A scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent.”

I may be a bit facetious, but show me a candidate for elective office, and I can likely produce letters from supporters that extol values befitting of an upstanding scout.

Editors are increasingly challenged to separate the wheat from the chaff in today’s orchestrated letter-writing campaigns. Election season demands special guidelines to let writers have their say and still maintain some control over the letters column. It’s an opportune time to sound the alarm to candidates and readers alike.