Page 142

Brush with death fails to deter Maine’s Nemitz from returning to war reporting

Gregory Rec photo, courtesy of Portland (Maine) Press Herald

By Debora Almeida, Bulletin Staff

Gregory Rec photo, courtesy of Portland (Maine) Press Herald

‘Bill Nemitz, at left, interviews an iraqi military officer and a village elder in a village near the northern iraq city of erbil in December 2004.’

Bill Nemitz, 61, a columnist at the Portland (Maine) Press Herald, made three trips to Iraq and two to Afghanistan to cover wars there. Two of those trips, one in each country, Nemitz will never forget.

Nemitz made his first two trips to Mosul, Iraq, in April and December 2004.

On Dec. 21, 2004, Nemitz and his colleague, Gregory Rec, a photographer for the Press Herald, skipped breakfast and went right to work so they could get most of their assignments done by lunchtime. When noon arrived, Rec, although hungry, decided to take a 15- to 20-minute nap while Nemitz finished some leftover work to pass the time. Those 15 minutes were enough to save their lives. During that time, a suicide bomber disguised as an Iraqi National Guard soldier killed four U.S. soldiers, four American civilians and four Iraqi soldiers inside a food pantry in the dining hall where they were planning to eat lunch, in Calais, Iraq.

When Rec and Nemitz bent down to lace up their boots and get ready for lunch, the explosion took place less than a quarter-mile away. The proximity of the explosion caused Nemitz to fall from his chair.

“If Greg hadn’t taken that nap, we would have been in the food line or eating our lunch in the dining hall,” Nemitz said. “His nap literally saved my life.”

Of the four U.S. soldiers killed, two were Maine National Guard soldiers. It was the first time Maine National Guard soldiers had died in a war zone since World War II.

“This was the biggest suicide attack on the U.S. troops throughout the entire Iraq war, which took over and dominated everything anybody did for the remainder of the trip,” Nemitz said. “The next few days were a complete blur.”

Nemitz kept thinking that he would never go back after experiencing such a life-threatening incident during his second trip. But that quickly changed once he understood what he really appreciated about war reporting, which was how easy it was to throw yourself into the situation and that you can’t stay away for too long.

“Adrenaline is pumping at all times, and you literally never know what’s going to happen in the next minute,” he said.

He said the experience could be boring for several days, but then, all hell can break loose.

“It’s a challenge, it really is; trust me,” Nemitz said.

Nemitz frequently had second thoughts and regrets, especially during his first trip to Kabul, Afghanistan, in January 2010, when he traveled alone with soldiers, with no photographer by his side. He had to do all the writing, editing, video, sound, and photos by himself as a “backpack journalist.”

After landing, he took a cab from the airport in Kabul on his own to a military base.

“Even a 15-minute cab ride alone was not considered safe due to common crimes such as kidnapping and murder,” he said.

Later, all the soldiers received their belongings. But Nemitz’ backpack, which contained all of his equipment and winter clothing, did not arrive, so he had to suffer through a freezing cold night without a winter jacket. At that moment, he recalled thinking that he had made a mistake coming back to a war zone.

“I was literally shivering, thinking that my stuff must be permanently lost, and that’s when the regret started to sink in,” Nemitz said.

He went back to the airport the next morning in search of his lost backpack. He had to pass through nine safety checkpoints just to get inside to talk to someone who could help him. But the biggest struggle was to try to explain, in English to non-English-speaking people, that he wanted to find his bag. After an hour’s wait, a plane arrived, and the second piece of luggage to come through the chute was a bag labeled “URGENT” in bold, capital letters.

“I will never forget the moment when I saw my bag, because in the hours before, I felt hopeless,” Nemitz said.

Besides the physical and psychological struggles, those trips were extremely costly, he said. The most expensive part was life insurance. Nemitz said he will always be grateful to the Press Herald for financially supporting his war-reporting expenses, and to his wife, Andrea Nemitz, a former assistant managing editor for photo, graphics and design at the Press Herald. She now works in communications and marketing for the Maine Community Foundation in Portland.

“She completely understood the reasons for my decision and was supportive throughout. I could have never accomplished this without her belief in me,” Nemitz said.

He kept in touch with her abroad through cheap phones with poor service, so communication was tough.

When asked what he gained from his war-reporting experiences, Nemitz said he made a lot of close friends, a bond that he won’t be able to share with others who weren’t there. He said that the more he covered the stories of soldiers he was with, especially those from Maine and the communities he knew, the more he got to know them.

“It became impossible not to befriend them,” he said.

Nemitz made other trips, in 2007 and 2013, to various cities in Iraq and Afghanistan respectively, where he covered soldiers on the Iraq border helping out with supply trucks. While being a reporter took most of his time, he did help wounded soldiers in a hospital whenever he was free.

“They (soldiers) kept going back and going back, months after months, and if we don’t tell their stories, nobody else will,” he said.

Nemitz has been a journalist in Maine since 1977. He began his career as a reporter at the then-Central Maine Morning Sentinel of Waterville. He moved to Portland in 1983, first as a reporter for the then-Evening Express. He later became city editor and assistant managing editor for sports for the Press Herald and its sister paper, the Maine Sunday Telegram. In 1995, he began writing his thrice-weekly column and has been doing that since.

Gregory Rec photo, courtesy of Portland (Maine) Press Herald

Nemitz hands out candy to children in a village in Irbil province in Northern Iraq in December 2004.

‘They (soldiers) kept going back and going back, months after months, and if we don’t tell their stories, nobody else will.’

–Bill Nemitz

Vanessa Faria, a student at Northeastern University and an intern with the Bulletin, contributed to this report.

Gabe Souza photo, courtesy of Portland (Maine) Press Herald
Bill Nemitz in Kabul, Afghanistan, in June 2010.
Gabe Souza photo, courtesy of Portland (Maine) Press Herald Bill Nemitz in Kabul, Afghanistan, in June 2010.
‘Even a 15-minute cab ride alone was not considered safe due to common crimes such as kidnapping and murder.’

–Bill Nemitz

‘Adrenaline is pumping at all times, and you literally never know what’s going to happen in the next minute.’

–Bill Nemitz

Share:

Industry News – Nov 2016

Newspaper-industry-news

Mobile/Online News

Social Media News

Legal Briefs

Industry News

Share:

What election results might portend for 1st Amendment

Gene Policinski First Amendment
Gene Policinski First Amendment

Gene Policinski, inside the First Amendment

Gene Policinski is chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute and senior vice president of the Institute’s First Amendment Center. He can be reached at gpolicinski@newseum.org.

Follow him on Twitter:
@genefac

For nearly two years, the nation has been through an exhausting process of sorting through possible candidates, selecting nominees and choosing those to be elected to offices high and low, local and state and national.

In many ways, such a season ends in a glory day for our First Amendment freedoms. Voting is the ultimate result of the constitutional protections of our core freedoms expressed in the First Amendment: the governed selecting those who, until the next election, are charged with governing on our behalf.

There is a reason we protect political speech above all other categories: It’s one of the essential parts of how our nation works, even when for many people, it’s effectively “not working.” The process remains the envy of the world, which periodically places it in the crosshairs of adversaries who would tear it down, now in ways we have not seen before.

Debate, discussion, disagreement and discourse are the ways we exchange our ideas in the public square — sometimes bitterly and angrily, to be sure. We also know from history that this oft-messy method has, over time, meant a continual renewal of our nation and its values, and improvement of the lives of our fellow citizens.

In more direct First Amendment terms, in our elections, we decide who responds to our petitions for change. Many of us during these long months of the 2016 presidential race have assembled to make our voices heard — either through actual assemblies and rallies, or through the increasingly common online communities formed by social media. For some people, tenets of faith or prayers for divine guidance will help us in deciding for whom to vote.

Through it all the press — with more participants than ever before — has been there to report, record, repeat, reproach or repost what candidates and the public are saying to and about each other.

To the regret of many people, it sometimes seems that the press has been in the news during this campaign season as often as reporting it.

Witness the latest example: the emotional criticism Newt Gingrich, former speaker of the U.S. House, directed at Fox News’s Megyn Kelly — and by extension, the news media in general — for being “fascinated with sex” over substantive issues. He immediately paired that, without irony, to an inquiry as to why former president Bill Clinton’s name isn’t as synonymous with the term “sexual predator” as Gingrich said is the case with GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Add in Trump’s outright attacks on journalists and news outlets in the harshest terms; the disdain earlier in the campaign from Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s months-long gap between press conferences, and criticism in polls and at rallies of the working press; Trump’s earlier conflict with Kelly over his post-debate remark about “blood coming out of her wherever;” and his threat to use the presidency to weaken libel laws to make it easier for himself and other public figures to sue journalists and their news organizations.

The Nov. 8 election results settled who got into office.

Not so certain is the path for a free press. With or without Trump’s promised assault on defamation law, traditional news organizations continue to shed staff as they face rising costs amid falling revenue. New media attract eyeballs, but for the most part, remained linked to the content produced by the aforementioned mainstream press.

Opinion and talk often substitute for news and information. During the past 20 years, the once-feared “watchdog on government” has lost more and more “teeth” — and in the case of cable television news channels, sometimes seems only to be barking for attention.

Many more than Trump challenged the veracity and motives of major news-media outlets. The data-dump website WikiLeaks feeds the national daily news diet with leaked private emails from the Clinton campaign amid rumors that it’s at least assisted — if not directed — by a hostile Russian government.

Whether it’s all of that, or Trump’s promise to diminish press protections, or Clinton’s expressed intent to reconstitute restrictions on contributions as a form of political speech, the future of free expression seems likely to remain “political” long after this year’s ballots are counted.

Share:

Avoid the ‘mush of counterfeits and cliches’

Jim Stasiowski, writing coach
Jim Stasiowski, writing coach

Jim Stasiowski, writing

Writing coach Jim Stasiowski welcomes your questions or comments.

Call him at
(775) 354-2872
or write to:
2499 Ivory Ann Drive
Sparks, NV 89436.

On a recent Sunday, I was watching my NFL team, the Baltimore Ravens, struggle against the New York Jets.

The game ended up a depressing fourth loss in a row for the Ravens, but at least I got one benefit from it, when, in the middle of the second half, with the outcome still in doubt, the play-by-play fellow said that the Ravens were “trying to snap a three-game losing streak.”

“Wrong!” I shouted, rising to my full (yet modest) height from my chair. (Writing coaches perversely love such mistakes.)

It is true that the Ravens had lost their three previous games. But, in fact, their “three-game losing streak” ended when they had lost the previous Sunday to the New York Giants. What the announcer meant was that the Ravens were “trying to end their losing streak at three games.”

I bring up the sloppiness of TV-sports coverage because sloppy usage begins somewhere, and lots of people, including lots of hard-news editors and reporters, watch and listen to sports broadcasts. It’s human nature: Whether we want to or not, we tend to imitate usages we hear.

Writing, whether for a newspaper, a postcard, a blog or a novel, is the assigning of words or phrases to ideas, actions or facts. As Jacques Barzun wrote in his book “Simple & Direct: A Rhetoric for Writers,” imitation can be deadly, especially when our choices are reflexive, based on bad usages that are repeated until they become standard:

“Such words and phrases are vague from the start or become so by vogue – overuse. They are in our heads because they are in fashion at the time.”

The sloppy “X-game losing streak” is among the most common errors.

I know, I know: People watching the Ravens-Giants game that day knew exactly what the announcer meant, so I should just butt out. But although TV announcers can get by with such almost-accurate statements – their words evaporate instantaneously – newspaper reporters require a higher standard, for our words live on.

If you watch any televised sports, you already know about the post-outcome interview. The interviewer, usually well-groomed and self-assured, can be counted on to ask the winner: “What does this victory mean to you?”

“It means a lot,” the winner will say, unless he decides to go really profound and say, “It means everything.”

I accept that those post-game interviewers have to hurry madly to grab someone to talk to, and I further recognize that viewers aren’t expecting lengthy analyses. My concern is more with the proliferation of such worthless interviews. I worry about Barzun’s point that with such inanities cemented in our brains, we in newspapers will, as we have in the past, fall into the trap of imitating TV.

But it’s not just TV that implants meaningless blather in our brains. The 2016 political season is rife with the same kind of nonsense. In your city, county or state elections, how many candidates have promised the magic phrase “economic development”?

That’s the cheapest of the cheap pledges, but did reporters look into the specifics? Did editors demand such investigation? “Economic development” often comes with large price tags, such as the loosening of development regulations and the concomitant risks to the environment, or the granting of tax-increment financing, which can drain tax revenues for local governments.

How about the pledge, “No new taxes”? I heard a lawmaker explain to constituents why she voted against a tax increase that passed. Her reasoning had nothing to do with whether the new tax would benefit the state. Her sole rationale: Because she had run on a platform of “no new taxes,” she simply had to vote “Nay.” She could not turn her back on that pledge, no matter how reasonable the new tax was.

In the coverage of her original election, shouldn’t we – and I include myself in this criticism – have made her answer for the possibility that some new tax in some circumstance she couldn’t foresee would be a positive for her constituents?

What we all have to be vigilant about is the tendency to hear a familiar statement or phrase and assume that, by its familiarity, it has achieved legitimacy. To go back to Barzun: “If you observe yourself when on the point of writing, you will notice that the words rising spontaneously to your mind are not the hard, clear words of a lover of plain speech, but this mush of counterfeits and clichés.”

THE FINAL WORD: Speaking of the silliness that springs from the coverage of sports, let’s erase “legendary” from our vocabulary.

As the dictionary points out, the adjective “‘legendary’ refers to something that may have a historical basis in fact but, in popular tradition, has undergone great elaboration and exaggeration.”

There have been athletes who fit that description – tales of Babe Ruth often seem stretched beyond what has been confirmed – but most excellent athletes of the modern era, even Michael Jordan and Michael Phelps, have had their histories carefully recorded.

Share:

Anne Brennan / Richard Lodge

Anne Brennan, GateHouse Media New England
Anne Brennan, GateHouse Media New England

Anne Brennan has been appointed, effective Dec. 5, as the new editorial leader for the west division of Gatehouse Media New England. The division is based in Framingham. Brennan succeeds Richard Lodge, who left GateHouse to become managing editor of The Daily News of Newburyport. Brennan is leaving as editor of CapeCodOnline.com, a newly launched lifestyle and entertainment website of the Cape Cod Times of Hyannis. In her new job, Brennan will oversee the MetroWest Daily News of Framingham, the Milford Daily News, and 20 weeklies based in GateHouse’s Framingham, Milford, North Attleboro and Walpole offices. Before her time as editor of CapeCodOnline.com, Brennan had been assistant managing editor for digital media at the Cape Cod Times for more than seven years. Her first job in journalism was at a weekly newspaper in California, before she became night police reporter at the Cape Cod Times. She covered several other beats and was involved with several investigative projects as a reporter and later as an editor there. Brennan is on the boards of the New England Society of News Editors and of the Associated Press Media Editors. She is a past president of the New England Society of News Editors.

The Transition was written, at least in part, from a published report by Bulletin correspondent Sophie Cannon, an undergraduate student at Northeastern University.

Share:

Virginia M. Allen

Virginia M. Allen, 81, of Plymouth, Mass., died Oct. 20 in Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

She was a receptionist for the former Plymouth-based Memorial Press Group newspapers, whose flagship was the Old Colony Memorial of Plymouth.

She leaves three children, Marianne, Jeannine and Cyntra; two grandchildren, Devin and Christopher; several nieces and nephews.

The obituaries were written, at least in part, from published reports by Bulletin correspondents Ashleane Alabre, Sophie Cannon, Jenna Ciccotelli, Nico Hall, Joshua Leaston, Georgeanne Oliver, Julia Preszler and Thomas Ward, undergraduate students at Northeastern University.

Share:

Nancy Wilson

Nancy Shepard McClelland Wilson of Grafton, Mass., and formerly of Holden, Mass., died of breast cancer Nov. 3 in Grafton. She was born in 1932.

Wilson was a former freelancer and editor for The Landmark of Holden. She also had been a journalist for the Toledo (Ohio) Blade.

She was a member of the Holden School Committee for three terms, from 1973 to 1980, and was its chairwoman for one term.

She leaves her husband, Richard; three children, Ira, Madeline and Baxter; three grandchildren.

The obituaries were written, at least in part, from published reports by Bulletin correspondents Ashleane Alabre, Sophie Cannon, Jenna Ciccotelli, Nico Hall, Joshua Leaston, Georgeanne Oliver, Julia Preszler and Thomas Ward, undergraduate students at Northeastern University.

Share:

James Patrick O’Connor Jr.

James Patrick O’Connor Jr., 89, of Waterford, Conn., died Oct. 21 in St. Francis Hospital in Hartford, Conn.

O’Connor was a compositor at The Day of New London, Conn.

He leaves his wife, Beverly; a son, Timothy; two daughters, Patricia and Kerry; seven grandchildren; six great-grandchildren; a brother.

The obituaries were written, at least in part, from published reports by Bulletin correspondents Ashleane Alabre, Sophie Cannon, Jenna Ciccotelli, Nico Hall, Joshua Leaston, Georgeanne Oliver, Julia Preszler and Thomas Ward, undergraduate students at Northeastern University.

Share:

Jeanette Severino Bouchard

Jeanette Severino Bouchard
Jeanette Severino Bouchard

Jeanette Severino Bouchard, 90, died Oct. 31 in South Portland, Maine, after a long period of declining health.

She was a photographic archivist for many years at the Portland (Maine) Press Herald.

She leaves five nieces, Stella, Marie, Lucretia, Margaret and Mary Ann, and a nephew, John.

The obituaries were written, at least in part, from published reports by Bulletin correspondents Ashleane Alabre, Sophie Cannon, Jenna Ciccotelli, Nico Hall, Joshua Leaston, Georgeanne Oliver, Julia Preszler and Thomas Ward, undergraduate students at Northeastern University.

Share:

Stanley K. Holmes

Stanley K. Holmes, 98, of Greenfield, Mass., died Aug. 27 in Buckley HealthCare Center in Greenfield.

Holmes began his career as a delivery boy for the former Greenfield Recorder-Gazette. After serving in the U.S. Army during World War II, he returned to the Recorder-Gazette as a Linotype compositor. He retired in 1982.

Holmes leaves his wife, Barbara; a daughter, Shirley; a son, Donald; two granddaughters; two great-grandsons.

The obituaries were written, at least in part, from published reports by Bulletin correspondents Ashleane Alabre, Sophie Cannon, Jenna Ciccotelli, Nico Hall, Joshua Leaston, Georgeanne Oliver, Julia Preszler and Thomas Ward, undergraduate students at Northeastern University.

Share: